Burn Tests DVD+R Media

Higher burn speed averages are better.


RICOHJPNR00 — 2.4X DVD+R
Drive Average Burn Length Mode
ASUS DRW-0402P/D 2.41X 4.38GB CLV
Gigabyte GO-W0404A 2.43X 4.38GB CLV
LiteOn LDW-411S 2.41X 4.38GB CLV
MSI DR4-A 2.41X 4.38GB CLV
NEC 1300A 2.41X 4.38GB CLV
Nu Tech DDW-081 2.46X 4.38GB CLV
Plextor 708A 2.42X 4.38GB CLV
Sony DRU-530A 2.41X 4.38GB CLV


MCC 002 — 4X DVD+R
Drive Average Burn Length Mode
ASUS DRW-0402P/D 4.01X 4.38GB CLV
Gigabyte GO-W0404A 4.00X 4.38GB CLV
LiteOn LDW-411S 4.02X 4.38GB CLV
MSI DR4-A 4.00X 4.38GB CLV
NEC 1300A 4.00X 4.38GB CLV
Nu Tech DDW-081 7.62X 4.38GB Z-CLV
Plextor 708A 7.67X 4.38GB Z-CLV
Sony DRU-530A 4.02X 4.38GB CLV


MCC 003 — 8X DVD+R
Drive Average Burn Length Mode
ASUS DRW-0402P/D 4.02X 4.38GB CLV
Gigabyte GO-W0404A 4.01X 4.38GB CLV
LiteOn LDW-411S 4.02X 4.38GB CLV
MSI DR4-A 4.01X 4.38GB CLV
NEC 1300A 4.01X 4.38GB CLV
Nu Tech DDW-081 7.62X 4.38GB Z-CLV
Plextor 708A 7.72X 4.38GB Z-CLV
Sony DRU-530A 6.63X 4.38GB Z-CLV


RICOHJPNR01 — 4X DVD+R
Drive Average Burn Length Mode
ASUS DRW-0402P/D 4.01X 4.38GB CLV
Gigabyte GO-W0404A 4.00X 4.38GB CLV
LiteOn LDW-411S 4.01X 4.38GB CLV
MSI DR4-A 4.00X 4.38GB CLV
NEC 1300A 4.00X 4.38GB CLV
Nu Tech DDW-081 7.65X 4.38GB Z-CLV
Plextor 708A 7.20X 4.38GB Z-CLV
Sony DRU-530A 4.05X 4.38GB CLV


YUDEN000T01 — 4X DVD+R
Drive Average Burn Length Mode
ASUS DRW-0402P/D 4.00X 4.38GB CLV
Gigabyte GO-W0404A 4.01X 4.38GB CLV
LiteOn LDW-411S 4.01X 4.38GB CLV
MSI DR4-A 4.00X 4.38GB CLV
NEC 1300A 4.00X 4.38GB CLV
Nu Tech DDW-081 7.66X 4.38GB Z-CLV
Plextor 708A 7.65X 4.38GB Z-CLV
Sony DRU-530A 4.03X 4.38GB CLV

It was quite disappointing that none of the burners could find a better write descriptor for the 2.4X Ricoh DVD+Rs. We were severely upset with the lack of 8X burn speeds on the Sony DRU-530A. Even though we achieved some fairly good burn speeds, the fact that we could only get 8X write descriptors for “MCC 003” (Verbatim) media was not very comforting. “MCC 003” media is not nearly as easy to find as “MCC 002” DVD+Rs. Both Plextor and Nu Tech did a great job of sweeping up the DVD+R competition.
Burn Tests CDR Media Burn Tests DVD-R Media
Comments Locked

41 Comments

View All Comments

  • rms - Saturday, December 13, 2003 - link

    Why was there no identification/information on the physical drive used in these products? I'm disappointed.

    rms
  • artifex - Saturday, December 13, 2003 - link

    Have you noticed that if you rip the ISO with DVDD, you need to burn it with that? I had trouble reading a DVD that I burned using Nero, but when I went back to DVDD for the burn it worked fine.
  • KristopherKubicki - Saturday, December 13, 2003 - link

    I use K3B and DVDTools for linux as well. Nero is good, depends on what you end up doing with it though. For ISOs and GIs, DVD Decryptor and Alcohol 120% are my particular choice of poisons.

    Cheers,

    Kristopher
  • sprockkets - Saturday, December 13, 2003 - link

    Haha, for some stupid reason that Sonic Software that came with my Lite On DVD+RW only drive said a new disc was already full or something stupid. Used nero from my other drive and works fine. Nero rocks, of course, under linux with SuSE and K3B and DVDtools it works fine too. Burns for me took around 13.5 min.
  • KristopherKubicki - Friday, December 12, 2003 - link

    Belzer, I emailed Nic about it. I was in fact using 2.24

    Kristopher
  • artifex - Friday, December 12, 2003 - link

    Hmmm turns out my drive is identical to the BTC 1004IM. What can I say? I don't see any drives using that base in the comparison either, though I hardly feel prejudiced against, like the Lite-On people :)

    Anyway, looks like it does what I need it to, even has Mount Rainier support (My RW5125A didn't according to DVDinfoPro), for 1/2 the Plextor or Sony, so I should live with it for a while, right? I mean... I'm used to burning DVDs at 2.4x anyway, and now I can use the - formats (yuck, if I have to).
  • Belzer - Friday, December 12, 2003 - link

    Kristopher: I think the MCC 003 should be identified as 8x in the latest (2.24) version of DVDInfoPro too.
  • artifex - Friday, December 12, 2003 - link

    Jeez, over $10? They must have a built-in Hollywood tax planned.

    I decided I couldn't wait. Fry's had a weird "Emprex" +- brand on sale for $90 before tax here in Dallas. I figure for under $100, I'll not worry about burning it up before Blu-ray... or whatever competes against it.

    I'll let you know how it works... so far I see the websites on the box don't have any info on the drive :( It does seem to have a reasonably complete set of software, though. If nothing else, I can use it a little while and exchange it.
  • KristopherKubicki - Friday, December 12, 2003 - link

    Belzer: Youre probably right. In DVD Info Pro, I got this (14)

    http://images.anandtech.com/reviews/storage/roundu...

    Looks like the discs are just ahead of their time ;)

    Kristopher
  • Belzer - Friday, December 12, 2003 - link

    Thanks for the update, Kristopher! Sorry if I sounded rude in my last post.

    About the Verbatim media:
    MCC 001 = 2.4x, MCC 002 = 4x, MCC 003 = 8x

    Check Philips' list with approved media:
    http://www.licensing.philips.com/services/db/midco...

    or check this thread:
    http://www.cdrlabs.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?t=13821

    or check Plextor's list of compatible media:
    http://www.plextor.com/english/support/media_708Co...

    or check for yourself with DVDIdentifier:
    http://dvd.identifier.cdfreaks.com/

    Verbatim probably hadn't the new 8x box art available yet so my guess is that they put the sample discs they sended to you in an old case.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now