Conclusions

Hopefully, our look at these eight burners was enough to help draw some conclusions about the burner that really is the drive to own. Typically, we do not give out Editor's Choice awards but for this cross-section of burners, we feel there is enough data to provide us with a winner for this holiday season.

Sony's DRU-530A and Plextor's 708A were the most viable opponents in this roundup. However, it is very clear that Plextor's PowerRec II technology isn't just a cookie cutter optimization. Even though the 708A and the DRU-530A are based on identical chipsets, the Plextor 708A smokes the Sony DRU-530A in DVD+R writes and compatibility. The only real advantage of the DRU-530A was slightly higher media compatibility on poorer quality DVD-Rs, and slightly better technical support. Right now, the Plextor 708A is priced slightly better than the Sony DRU-530A ($199 versus $219, respectively, with MIR), but given Sony's leverage, the DRU-530A will probably be priced equivalent to the 708A after the holiday season. Kudos to Plextor for winning our well-deserved Editor's Choice award in this roundup.


For those who argue the NEC and LiteOn burners are “good enough” for $100, we feel that this is partially correct, but you get what you pay for. When you end up spending an additional $50 for decent burning software, the savings from these two burners isn't quite that dramatic. Our issues with customer support and media compatibility were something to be desired as well. Don't forget to check out the following second part of this roundup when we have first generation 8X DVD-R burners to evaluate.

We are not fans of honorable mentions, but we think Nu Tech actually deserves one here. Since they did not have a dual capable firmware in time for our roundup, it would not be fair for us to give them an Editor's Choice award in our Dual Format Roundup. However, if Nu Tech does indeed debut with their dual firmware on December 15th (as claimed), we will re-evaluate their burn speeds and price. After all, Nu Tech does have all the components right for winning this roundup (bitsetting, price tag, performance, software bundle). Good luck to Nu Tech, and we will see them again in a couple weeks.

Not only were we analyzing each individual burner in this roundup, we were also analyzing which DVD forum came out ahead in burn time and burn quality. Compatibility with various DVD drives has become less of an issue with DVD+R lately, particularly due to the die-hard fans and companies who write bitsetting utilities. It is slightly unfair to claim DVD+R the leader in this roundup because DVD-R does not support 8X burn speeds yet, but that is exactly what we feel is correct. Not only does DVD+R excel in 8X burn speeds, but DVD+RW outperforms DVD-RW with 4X and 2.4X burn times versus 2X.

Today, we looked at eight burners that make up the majority of this holiday season's DVD recordable market. Unfortunately, we couldn't include everyone. Within the upcoming weeks, we are anticipating 8X DVD+R and DVD-R capable drives from LiteOn, Pioneer, ASUS, and AOpen. Of course, had we waited for their debut, Anand would be wondering why I charged six dual format DVD drives to his credit card. Stay tuned in the next couple of months for the follow up — 8X DVD-R roundup!

Read Tests Printed Media
Comments Locked

41 Comments

View All Comments

  • Icewind - Friday, December 12, 2003 - link

    Wait, so in the Avg Write Column in your XLS sheet, thats TIME not The actually speed of the burner itself?

    Ok, looking at it, the way you have it labeled it looks alot more like the average speed the burner BURNED at, not the actual time.
  • KristopherKubicki - Friday, December 12, 2003 - link

    I apologize if there was a bias away from the LiteOn drive. It was unintentional.

    PXC, alexruiz: The DD0203 was originally supposed to be in this roundup, but I severed the cable taking it apart to look at the chipset :) It will be in the next roundup.

    Kristopher
  • pxc - Friday, December 12, 2003 - link

    What's up with the anti-LiteOn bias in the article? It didn't fail any tests like the NEC 1300A did, but it's trashed from first mention and in the conclusion.

    #15, I can tell you why the DD020x wasn't included: it's junk. I've had one for over a month now and it has the worst media compatibility of any dual format drive. Even the media that generally works will also fail 20% of the time. It would do Optorite no good to have it's buggy drive compared to working drives.
  • KristopherKubicki - Friday, December 12, 2003 - link

    My contacts at Plextor told me dual layer media is going to cost upwards of $10. Ill pass. I am more interested in BluRay anyway.

    Kristopher
  • artifex - Friday, December 12, 2003 - link

    I'd be willing to pay more than double the then DVD+R price for DVD+R dual layer media, assuming that hard drive prices haven't gone down much before then.
  • KristopherKubicki - Friday, December 12, 2003 - link

    Belzer: Thank you for the feedback. I do appreciate your thoroughness and I have corrected a number of errors.

    I do digress concerning the MCC 003 Media, however. Not only does DVD Info Pro identify the media as 4X write, but the Verbatim box art also identifies the media as "1-4X".

    I have all of the images from CDSpeed, so it looks like i will be spending the rest of my friday uploading them and inserting them into the article. :)

    Good to be done with finals ;)

    Kristopher
  • alexruiz - Friday, December 12, 2003 - link

    A little surprised to find that some other available burners were not included:

    1) One of the most popular dual burners WAS NOT included (Optorite DD0203/DD0201) Furthermore, there is already available the 8x "+" version (DD0401)

    2) Another one is the BTC 1004IM, or the big brother, the 8x 1008IM that is supposed to write DVD-R at 8x also...

    Chistpher, can we include the Optorite DD0401 AND the BTC 1008IM for the next review?


    Alex
  • michec - Friday, December 12, 2003 - link

    When was this review done? The 8X dual-format Lite-On drive is not a drive that is being anticipated - it's already available. I got mine on Nov 30th at a local computer show. Why bother with reviewing 4x drives when there is a 8x version that is available? What a waste of time and energy reviewing the 4x Lite-On.
  • LoneWolf1 - Friday, December 12, 2003 - link

    In regards to #8. You may download our entire burn time spreadsheet.

    http://images.anandtech.com/reviews/storage/roundu...
  • Icewind - Friday, December 12, 2003 - link

    Heres a link

    http://www.cdfreaks.com/news2.php?ID=8051

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now