Speakers

I decided since we were upgrading the systems that maybe a change was in order for the speakers also. Our desktop space is limited so a 5.1 system is out of the question - although for my daughter, it would make sense considering her movie watching habits. Our Sonigistix Monsoon MM 2000 units are getting a bit long in the tooth, not from an audio experience, but the general wear and tear for the last six years have left our sets slightly damaged. While a steady stream of super glue has kept the speaker stands in working order, cable tears and the occasional drink spill have left the sets needing some serious TLC to work perfectly.

This upgrade is a budget buster and something I did not plan on when the process started. I thought about moving around a few speaker sets between the other computers but space and application needs dictated something different. I have not been a big fan of most personal computer speaker systems although Logitech, Klipsch, and Creative have had their fair share of success in the upper-end market. I own products from each supplier but they are 5.1 configurations.

I can get away with a 2.0 system and my daughter will just need a solid 2.1 configuration. Certainly, I was looking in a price range that would not completely break the bank or send a red flag up for a divorce lawyer. Something like the Logitech Z-2300 for my daughter or the M-Audio StudioPro 3 for me was in order since prices were under $100 each. In fact, even discussing speakers is probably going to be controversial as audio quality can be very subjective at times. What my ear hears from these speakers can be completely different from another person sitting next to me. My suggestions suit the requirements I have and more importantly, how I like to listen to music. There are certainly other choices available in the price ranges I selected and they might be even better than the brand name I like.


I have always been a big Swan fan and someone will have to pry the M200MkII from my cold dead hands before I give them up. The new M12 units probably would have been perfect, but knowing my daughter would not really notice the difference I saved some money and bought the Swan M10 setup for just a few dollars more than the Logitech Z-2300. While the Logitech speakers win the battle of the bass, the Swan's provide just an incredible clarity with superb mids and highs for the money. The soundstage comes across as being larger than it actually is and instrument separation is excellent. The subwoofer has an excellent and responsive upper bass that matches very well with the midrange, but down low it could use a little more punch (certainly if you like thumping bass) and decay times are poor compared to larger units. The subwoofer is best placed on the desktop if possible. About the only drawbacks are the volume control on the sub, the satellite cables being soldered, and the four-foot cables. Otherwise, this almost perfect desktop setup offers a very intimate and smooth soundstage that even got a big thumbs up from my daughter - not only for the sound but for the looks as well.

The M10 units would have suited me perfectly and I probably should have gone that direction for saving money also. However, being the one to try something different, I decided to look at the Swan D1080MkII series after understanding them to be an inexpensive M200 substitute. First off, let me say they are not an M200 substitute, but I doubt anything in this price range is or could be. That said, these speakers actually sounded better to me than the M10s in most instances, even without the subwoofer.

The high frequency definition and transient response is very good along with smooth and clear highs after the break-in period. The midrange is close to the M200 series and is the greatest strength of this speaker set. I would grade it somewhere between very good to excellent with sharp transients, stable imaging, and a very open but neutral sound stage. The upper bass is very good and provides a seamless transition into the midrange. Obviously, without a sub the lower bass is trails off quickly, but there is a little punch in this design. However, this setup is not for heavy rock/hip-hop listeners or those who like deep pounding bass in their movies.

I listen to an eclectic mix of music and these speakers are great for classical, classic rock, jazz, pop, blues, country, and other music that tends to emphasize vocals or instrumentation. Surprisingly, gaming and movie playback are very good, except in titles where deep or loud explosions are the norm. In the end, I would probably recommend saving for the M200MkII speakers but if I did not have that chance, the D1080Mk11 is more than satisfying as a primary 2.0 desktop set.

Audio Part One Ends...
Comments Locked

33 Comments

View All Comments

  • PCMerlin - Tuesday, May 27, 2008 - link

    Lightning, looking through the article he mentions Vista drivers, media streaming and other features that one would assume is only available in Vista Ultimate Edition (64-bit, of course with 8GB of RAM). Being that it is not included in the budget, one must also assume that he is transferring the OS from the original PC's, which indicates that he is using the retail, and not the OEM version.
    Armed with that info, users who want to build a system just like this should add another $269 to the total, based on average retailer figures.

    Note: As the cost of the case is note mentioned as well, those trying to replicate the total cost of the system would need to compensate for that as well.
  • darkmarc - Tuesday, May 27, 2008 - link

    Good article, I also went down SFF SG03 route - with Nehalem just around the corner and my ageing amd X2 creeking away, I wanted a system that wouldn't suffer obsolescence to quickly. The SFF is a great intermediate solution, once Nehalem has matured I can then turn it into home server. I went for the Asus P5E-VM mobo with Q6600, 8gb ddr2, 8800GTS (as it runs cooler then the GT) a Creative X-Fi sound card that I canabalised from my old system and two Samsung 1tb hhd's. I kept the stock cooler, went for the 600w Silverstone psu and two Noctua fans keeping it cool at the front. The Asus board lets me run the Q6600 at 3ghz without a problem so with the 8gig of ram it's great for running VM's. I have the LG GGC-H20L drive for all my Blu-ray/HD-dvd needs, hooked up to a Hyundai 24" panel. It is very quiet and has all the power I need and I don't have to worry about upgrading it as it will fulfill a secondary role.
  • Viditor - Tuesday, May 27, 2008 - link

    In most all of the build articles I've read, the one thing everyone forgets is to add the price of the OS in. Even though it's the same, many people forget that cost when they plan their next system (leads to disappointment from the unitiated).
  • amphionuk - Wednesday, May 28, 2008 - link

    Why pay for your OS?

    If you don't want to play the latest games, you can install Ubuntu or one of the other Linux distros for free.

  • drfelip - Tuesday, May 27, 2008 - link

    Good article, I think SFF computers are a good option for most users, and I like the small cases a lot, but sometimes it's difficult to find reviews and comparisions of SFF cases micro-ATX boards and barebones. I think this is an area to expand!
  • Visual - Tuesday, May 27, 2008 - link

    A very nice looking case recommendation for the next part of your guide: GMC AVC-S7
    http://www.driverheaven.net/reviews.php?reviewid=5...">http://www.driverheaven.net/reviews.php?reviewid=5...

    Not for everyone, obviously, with its single PCI card limit. But some people like smaller is better. If you go with integrated video and all you need is a tuner, this is as small as you can get. It's also possible, though more hassle, to get this with a pci-express riser instead of pci riser, so you can have a graphic card.
  • DXRick - Tuesday, May 27, 2008 - link

    The Silverstone SG03 takes micro-ATX mobos. Why limit it to uATX?
  • Visual - Tuesday, May 27, 2008 - link

    I'm confused... uATX is micro-ATX. So what are you asking, again?
  • Flunk - Tuesday, May 27, 2008 - link

    The official short for for micro-ATX is mATX. Sometimes the greek ltter µ (Mu) is substituted for the word micro, particularly for scientific purposes. Sometimes people use u as a substitute for µ because it doesn't appear on the standard keyboard map. This is confusing (as evidenced above) and inaccurate.
  • DXRick - Wednesday, May 28, 2008 - link

    I looked it up on Newegg before replying (try it sometime).

    Micro-ATX is 9.6 x 9.6.
    uATX is 9.6 x 8.4.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now