ASUS CRW-5224A: CDR's Reach The End of the Line
by Kristopher Kubicki on January 13, 2003 7:26 PM EST- Posted in
- Storage
Benchmark
For our benchmark of the
ASUS CRW-4012A-U, we ran 4 intensive tests on the drive and the media bundled
with the drive. The tests were all performed on the following testbed
with no programs running other than Nero CDSpeed and Nero Burning
Gigabyte GA-7VRX |
AMD Athlon MP 2100+ |
2x128 DDR Corsair XMS 2400 |
ThermalTake Volcano 7 |
Seagate Cheetah 10000RPM |
Inno3D GeForce4 Ti 4200 |
Antec 420W Power Supply |
Windows 2000 SP3 Professional |
In order to test the drive, we will use the most versatile and widely used benchmarking suites for CDs. There are several intensive tests inside CDSpeed that we will be using. The first test is on a 24X rated ASUS CDRW bundled with the drive. The second test will be using the ASUS 52X CDR media bundled with the drive in order to test the maximum write speed of the drive. The last and probably most informative test is the maximum data read speeds from the drive. Remember, the drive is rated at 52X read and write.
We mentioned earlier that the drive burns at 52X at the fastest part of the burn. We can see from our burn tests that the drive peaks at 52X just at the end of the burn. Slightly interesting was that the drive actually reached speeds just under 52.5X, but our best guess is that 52.5X does not have the best marketing ring to it.
Even though the CRW-5224A
burns using CAV rather than ZCLV, we still achieved impressive results.
The final burn time on the ASUS media that was bundled with the drive was
As we noted with the 4012A-U, even with DDS-II, this unit was really loud. When attempting to spin up, the unit sounds more like a helicopter than a CDRW drive. Since we have both the 4012A-U and the 5224A in the lab, we actually determined the 5224A was a little louder. If you have gone out of your way to make your computer as quiet as possible, keep noise in mind when buying this unit.
4 Comments
View All Comments
Anonymous User - Tuesday, July 29, 2003 - link
Why didn't they make the CD-RW and DVD-RW writting standard like a hardrive? Why couldn't they have used HPFS, or even FAT32 instead of the sequential writting style? It probably would of been a lot quicker to read an write, and you wouldn't need some silly floppy image at the beginning of your CD to make it bootable.rayahari - Friday, August 6, 2010 - link
Hey guys its a nice and fast drive.New one avaible on Ebay for lowwwest price - http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&...
wisetech - Monday, October 14, 2019 - link
Inbox wisetechhacker at g mail dot com or text +1{917}5085328 for the services of a certified and ethical hacker to change college grades,clear criminal records etc...hit me up and it's doneAprilLee - Wednesday, March 18, 2020 - link
What was the need to introduce CRW-5224A when already the features were present in CRW-4012A-U.? I think instead of wasting time on describing the same thing one must focus on the flaws of this CD at https://assignmentjunkie.co.uk/homework-writing-se... and then introduce something better than the previous.