The GIGABYTE B360 Gaming 3 WIFI Review: A Cheaper Alternative at $120
by Joe Shields on July 11, 2018 9:45 AM ESTBoard Features
The B360 AORUS Gaming 3 WIFI presents users with an ATX size board that offers users many of the features of the Z370 based chipset, but in its non-overclocking form, and a few extras. The Gaming 3 WIFI includes dual M.2 slots (an x4 and x2), a back panel USB 3.1 Type-A port, as well as the latest Intel CNVi 802.11ac Wi-Fi module which has 802.11ac Wave 2 technology supporting speeds up to 1.73 Gbps. If the included RGB LED illumination isn't enough, there are onboard headers for both regular and digital LED light strips so each LED is addressable for more lighting patterns. Overall the AORUS Gaming 3 WIFI offers users a lot of functionality for the class board it slots into.
B360 AORUS Gaming 3 WIFI | |
Warranty Period | 3 Years |
Product Page | LINK |
Price | $120 (Amazon) |
Size | ATX |
CPU Interface | LGA1151 |
Chipset | Intel B360 |
Memory Slots (DDR4) | Two DDR4 Dual Channel Supporting 32GB Up to DDR4 2666 |
Network Connectivity / Wi-Fi | 1 x Intel I219V GbE |
Onboard Audio | Realtek ALC892 7.1ch surround |
Video Outputs | 1 x DVI-D 1 x HDMI (1.4) |
PCIe Slots for Graphics (from CPU) | 1 x PCIe 3.0 |
PCIe Slots for Other (from PCH) | N/A |
Onboard SATA | 6 Ports |
Onboard SATA Express | None |
Onboard M.2 | 1 x PCIe 3.0 x4 and SATA modes 1 x PCIe 3.0 x2 and SATA modes |
Onboard U.2 | None |
USB 3.1 | 1 x Back Panel (Type-A) |
USB 3.0 | Chipset 1 x Back Panel (Type-C) 2 x Back Panel (Type-A) 2 via Header |
USB 2.0 | Chipset 4 x Back Panel (Type-A) 2 via Header |
Power Connectors | 1 x 24-pin ATX 1 x 8-pin CPU |
Fan Headers | 1 x CPU 1 x Water Cooling CPU 2 x System 1 x System/Water Cooling Pump Header *All fan headers 4-pin Hybrid (PWM and DC) |
IO Panel | 1 x PS/2 keyboard/mouse 1 x DVI-D 1 x HDMI (1.4) 1 x USB 3.1 Type-A port (red) 1 x USB 3.0 Type-C port 2 x USB 3.0 ports 4 x USB 2.0/1.1 ports 1 x RJ-45 6 x Audio jacks |
We've also included an image of the block diagram showing the internal workings of the motherboard.
Test Bed
As per our testing policy, we take a high-end CPU suitable for the motherboard that was released during the socket’s initial launch and equip the system with a suitable amount of memory running at the processor maximum supported frequency. This is also typically run at JEDEC sub timings where possible. It is noted that some users are not keen on this policy, stating that sometimes the maximum supported frequency is quite low, or faster memory is available at a similar price, or that the JEDEC speeds can be prohibitive for performance. While these comments make sense, ultimately very few users apply memory profiles (either XMP or other) as they require interaction with the BIOS, and most users will fall back on JEDEC supported speeds - this includes home users as well as industry who might want to shave off a cent or two from the cost or stay within the margins set by the manufacturer. Where possible, we will extend our testing to include faster memory modules either at the same time as the review or a later date.
Readers of our motherboard review section will have noted the trend in modern motherboards to implement a form of MultiCore Enhancement / Acceleration / Turbo (read our report here) on their motherboards. This does several things, including better benchmark results at stock settings (not entirely needed if overclocking is an end-user goal) at the expense of heat and temperature. It also gives, in essence, an automatic overclock which may be against what the user wants. Our testing methodology is ‘out-of-the-box’, with the latest public BIOS installed and XMP enabled, and thus subject to the whims of this feature. It is ultimately up to the motherboard manufacturer to take this risk – and manufacturers taking risks in the setup is something they do on every product (think C-state settings, USB priority, DPC Latency/monitoring priority, overriding memory sub-timings at JEDEC). Processor speed change is part of that risk, and ultimately if no overclocking is planned, some motherboards will affect how fast that shiny new processor goes and can be an important factor in the system build.
Test Setup | |
Processor | Intel i7 8700K (6C/12T, 3.7G, 95W) |
Motherboard | GIGABYTE B360 AORUS Gaming 3 WIFI (BIOS F4) |
Cooling | Corsair H115i |
Power Supply | Corsair HX750 |
Memory | Corsair Vengeance LPX 4x8GB DDR4 2666 CL16 Corsair Vengeance 4x4GB DDR4 3200 CL16 (used in 2x 4/8GB capacity on dual Channel Platform) |
Memory Settings | DDR4 2666 CL16-18-18-35 2T |
Video Cards | ASUS Strix GTX 980 |
Hard Drive | Crucial MX300 1TB |
Optical Drive | TSST TS-H653G |
Case | Open Test Bed |
Operating System | Windows 10 Pro 64-bit |
Many thanks to...
We must thank the following companies for kindly providing hardware for our multiple test beds. Some of this hardware is not in this testbed specifically but is used in other testing.
Thank you to ASUS for providing us with GTX 980 Strix GPUs. At the time of release, the STRIX brand from ASUS was aimed at silent running, or to use the marketing term: '0dB Silent Gaming'. This enables the card to disable the fans when the GPU is dealing with low loads well within temperature specifications. These cards equip the GTX 980 silicon with ASUS' Direct CU II cooler and 10-phase digital VRMs, aimed at high-efficiency conversion. Along with the card, ASUS bundles GPU Tweak software for overclocking and streaming assistance.
The GTX 980 uses NVIDIA's GM204 silicon die, built upon their Maxwell architecture. This die is 5.2 billion transistors for a die size of 298 mm2, built on TMSC's 28nm process. A GTX 980 uses the full GM204 core, with 2048 CUDA Cores and 64 ROPs with a 256-bit memory bus to GDDR5. The official power rating for the GTX 980 is 165W.
The ASUS GTX 980 Strix 4GB (or the full name of STRIX-GTX980-DC2OC-4GD5) runs a reasonable overclock over a reference GTX 980 card, with frequencies in the range of 1178-1279 MHz. The memory runs at stock, in this case, 7010 MHz. Video outputs include three DisplayPort connectors, one HDMI 2.0 connector, and a DVI-I.
Further Reading: AnandTech's NVIDIA GTX 980 Review
Thank you to Crucial for providing us with MX300 SSDs. Crucial stepped up to the plate as our benchmark list grows larger with newer benchmarks and titles, and the 1TB MX300 units are strong performers. Based on Marvell's 88SS1074 controller and using Micron's 384Gbit 32-layer 3D TLC NAND, these are 7mm high, 2.5-inch drives rated for 92K random read IOPS and 530/510 MB/s sequential read and write speeds.
The 1TB models we are using here support TCG Opal 2.0 and IEEE-1667 (eDrive) encryption and have a 360TB rated endurance with a three-year warranty.
Further Reading: AnandTech's Crucial MX300 (750 GB) Review
Thank you to Corsair for providing us with Vengeance LPX DDR4 Memory, HX750 Power Supply, and H115i CPU Cooler.
Corsair kindly sent a 4x8GB DDR4 2666 set of their Vengeance LPX low profile, high-performance memory for our stock testing. The heatsink is made of pure aluminum to help remove heat from the sticks and has an eight-layer PCB. The heatsink is a low profile design to help fit in spaces where there may not be room for a tall heat spreader; think a SFF case or using a large heatsink. Timings on this specific set come in at 16-18-18-35. The Vengeance LPX line supports XMP 2.0 profiles for easily setting the speed and timings. It also comes with a limited lifetime warranty.
Powering the test system is Corsair's HX750 Power Supply. This HX750 is a dual mode unit able to switch from a single 12V rail (62.5A/750W) to a five rail CPU (40A max ea.) and is also fully modular. It has a typical selection of connectors, including dual EPS 4+4 pin four PCIe connectors and a whopping 16 SATA power leads, as well as four 4-pin Molex connectors.
The 135mm fluid dynamic bearing fan remains off until it is 40% loaded offering complete silence in light workloads. The HX750 comes with a ten-year warranty.
In order to cool these CPUs, Corsair sent over its latest and largest AIO in the H115i. This closed-loop system uses a 280mm radiator with 2x140mm SP140L PWM controlled fans. The pump/block combination mounts to all modern CPU sockets. Users are also able to integrate this cooler into the Corsair link software via USB for more control and options.
18 Comments
View All Comments
drw28 - Wednesday, July 11, 2018 - link
can you review the gigabyte UD pro drives?the combination of phison s10 and toshiba's bics nand would be interesting to see.peevee - Wednesday, July 11, 2018 - link
There used to be you could get a decent ATX MB for the latest mainstream CPU for around $50. What happened? Is it Intel overpricing their chipsets?imaheadcase - Wednesday, July 11, 2018 - link
In what world did you visit to get that cheap..i think you are mistaken.DanNeely - Wednesday, July 11, 2018 - link
In aggressive sales perhaps. Otherwise, while I recall seeing an occasional $50 board; the reviews always indicated that there was something wrong with them. Either from a company known to only build garbage (eg PC Chips, ECS before they figured out how to make good products, or a few other companies who're dead and forgotten) or an occasional screwed up board from a mainstream brand. I remember getting an ASUS S939 board for maybe $60 years ago, when it crapped out and I looked at reviews I turned out that I wasn't alone, something like 50% 1/2 stars from people whose boards had died on them.The True Morbus - Thursday, July 12, 2018 - link
I think there used to a PERCEPTION that you could get a decent board for 50 bucks, but that's probably because most 150$ boards looked similar to most 50$ boards.You can still buy the 50$ boards if you want. They'll be the first thing to give out in the build, you can write that down. And no, it doesn't matter if they're from a famous brand, they'll likely give out even quicker if that's the case.
PeachNCream - Thursday, July 12, 2018 - link
The last $50 motherboard I purchased was a Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-HD2 which was a FM2 socket mATX board. The SATA connectors all failed at the same time about three months after I bought it. There was a DVD drive on one and a 1TB WD hard drive on another when it gave up and stopped detecting devices. I tried a few other drives, shuffled ports around, got new cables, etc and the hard drive worked in an external case just fine (still is working in fact). It wasn't worth the trouble to go through customer support for RMA, but it was a bit annoying. That was the last time I wasted effort on a desktop of any sort and PC games for the most part as well. Glad to be done with that particular disaster after multiple decades of chasing system requirements. Cell phone gaming FTW!peevee - Thursday, July 12, 2018 - link
My last personal builds were in 2000 (on ASUS) and 2011 (ASRock). Never failed. Maybe they were 50-something.peevee - Thursday, July 12, 2018 - link
The latter is the Z68 board I still use. With then brand-new top-of-the-consumer-line i7-2600k.Still OCZ Vertex 3 256GB bought for $500 then, still works (although until they have fixed its firmware about a year later it had troubles). Now THAT one still alive is a surprise.
Galcobar - Wednesday, July 11, 2018 - link
Some copy editing might be in order. Aside from the raft of grammatical errors (e.g. worth vs worthy of), random commas and typos (e.g. B350, i7-8400), specifications are contradictory.For example, page 1: "... a total [of] four USB 2.0 ports, three USB 3.0 ports (one Type-C), and one USB 3.1 (10 Gbps) port (red Type-A)."
Page 2: "USB 2.0 (4x ports), USB 3.0 (3x ports) and a USB 3.1 Type-C port"
Also, when did Anandtech switch (back) to referring to USB 3.1 Gen 1 and Gen 2 as, respectively, USB 3.0 and 3.1? Five days ago it was the former.
Joe Shields - Wednesday, July 11, 2018 - link
The typo mentioned RE: USB was corrected. Thank you for catching that.As far as the 'switch'.... I know in my reviews, at least the past dozen or two, I have been referring to it in this manner consistently AFAIK. Prior to that I would use something like "USB 3.1 (speed here)" to clarify.