Performance - Serious Sam: The Second Encounter
Although we planned on using only Serious Sam: The Second Encounter
scores for the systems running under extreme quality, we felt it was necessary
to run the game under default quality to show how much the J4 is hurting by
using an SDR memory bus and a crippled Mobility Radeon 7500 solution.
Serious
Sam: The Second Encounter
Default Quality 640x480x32 |
|
|
0 |
|
21 |
|
41 |
|
62 |
|
83 |
|
103 |
|
124 |
|
|
|
Right off the bat we see the unexpected. The WinBook J4 2.4GHz
and the desktop 2.4GHz machines are both beaten out by the Compaq
Presario 2800T at 1.7GHz. Why is this, you ask. Well, it is because Serious
Sam is a very memory bandwidth intensive test and the use of an SDR memory bus
on the J4 and on the desktop system we tested really slows the performance down.
Even on a processor that is 700MHz faster and a video card that is slightly
faster, the SDR bus cripples the desktop 2.4GHz machine enough to cause it to
be outperformed by the DDR Compaq notebook.
Serious
Sam: The Second Encounter
Default Quality 800x600x32 |
|
|
0 |
|
18 |
|
35 |
|
53 |
|
70 |
|
88 |
|
105 |
|
|
|
Again, the SDR bus and slower Mobility Radeon 7500 holds the J4
system back. The J4 is the slowest of the bunch, being outperformed by the Compaq
Presario 2800T at 1.7GHz by 18%.
Serious
Sam: The Second Encounter
Default Quality 1024x768x32 |
|
|
0 |
|
13 |
|
27 |
|
40 |
|
54 |
|
67 |
|
8 |
|
|
|
The DDR memory bus used by the Compaq Presario 2800T really shines
in Serious Sam. Even the faster processor of the WinBook J4 does not give it
the oomph it needs to outperform the 2800T.
Serious
Sam: The Second Encounter
Default Quality 1280x1024x32 |
|
|
0 |
|
9 |
|
19 |
|
28 |
|
38 |
|
47 |
|
56 |
|
|
|
Things stay the same at 1280x1024x32 thus proving our point: the WinBook J4
2.4GHz is severely penalized by using an SDR memory bus and a slower clocked
Mobility Radeon 7500.
Serious
Sam: The Second Encounter
Extreme Quality 640x480x32 |
Desktop
2.4GHz SDR
WinBook
J4 2.4GHz
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
15 |
|
30 |
|
45 |
|
60 |
|
75 |
|
90 |
|
|
|
As we crank up the amount of work the video chip must do the performance difference
between the desktop machine and the WinBook J4 grows. Even at 640x480x32 the
WinBook J4 2.4GHz is running 88% slower than the desktop machine thanks in part
to the slow ruining Mobility Radeon 7500 employed by WinBook.
Serious
Sam: The Second Encounter
Extreme Quality 800x600x32 |
Desktop
2.4GHz SDR
WinBook
J4 2.4GHz
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
12 |
|
24 |
|
36 |
|
48 |
|
60 |
|
72 |
|
|
|
The performance difference grows to 91% at 800x600x32.
Serious
Sam: The Second Encounter
Extreme Quality 1024x768x32 |
Desktop
2.4GHz SDR
WinBook
J4 2.4GHz
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
9 |
|
18 |
|
27 |
|
36 |
|
45 |
|
54 |
|
|
|
And a large 113% at 1024x768x32.
Serious
Sam: The Second Encounter
Extreme Quality 1280x1024x32 |
Desktop
2.4GHz SDR
WinBook
J4 2.4GHz
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
7 |
|
14 |
|
20 |
|
27 |
|
34 |
|
41 |
|
|
|
Finally at 1280x1024x32 the WinBook J4 2.4GHz is a full 168% slower than its
desktop counterpart.
2 Comments
View All Comments
Poopship - Tuesday, December 18, 2012 - link
i-BuddiePoopship - Tuesday, December 18, 2012 - link
Why was everything expensive crappy plastic garbage. desktop p4 lol