Dell pioneered the thin-bezel laptop, but that does not mean they did not have room to improve on their original design over the years. The first several generations featured a webcam at the bottom of the panel, which was flattering to no one. With the proliferation of video chat, such a decision would be a major negative to many people. But thankfully Dell solved that particular issue a couple of generations ago, and the new model continues to pack a 720p webcam in the correct location above the display, with only a slightly taller top display bezel to accommodate the camera. And speaking of the display bezel, Dell has tweaked their design language slightly over the XPS 13 2-in-1, with both the black and white models both featuring a black display bezel on the clamshell XPS 13, which helps it disappear into the background a bit easier than the white bezel on the 2-in-1.

The XPS 13 in Platinum Silver with black carbon fiber

Another nice change over the 2-in-1 version is that Dell is not using their MagLev keyboard design, instead outfitting the XPS 13 with a more traditional scissor-switch keyboard with 1.0 mm of travel. The MagLev has a very short throw, whereas I find the traditional keyboard to be much more reassuring to use.

Dell is offering the XPS 13 in the same color choices as the 2-in-1 as well. The Platinum Silver model features a black carbon fiber keyboard deck with a soft-touch coating, while the Arctic White model features a woven fiber keyboard deck which Dell has treated with a stain and UV resistant coating, to prevent the deck from yellowing with age. The Arctic White is only $49 more, and certainly makes a statement, although it still suffers from the same issue as all white-on-white laptops with white backlighting, which is that the keyboard backlighting can wash out the keys in a bright room. That is a fairly minor negative though, for an otherwise fantastic finish.

The XPS 13 also features an excellent trackpad, offering a very smooth finish, and good precision. Laptop trackpads have come a long way, and part of that is the standardization on the Microsoft Precision touchpad drivers, which Dell employs here.

Dell has eschewed the use of USB Type-A ports, instead offering just a single USB Type-C port on each side of the laptop. This in turn is paired with a 3.5 mm headset jack on the right, and a micro SD card reader on the left. Although the XPS 13 lacks ports in numbers, it somewhat makes up for that with both USB ports supporting Thunderbolt 3, including power delivery. It is unfortunate that the Type-C port has found itself to be so confusing in its capabilities, but with the XPS 13 supporting the full range of protocols, as well as four lanes of PCIe on both ports, that at least is not a liability here. Dell does include a Type-C to Type-A adapter in the box as well, for those that require the larger port. By including power delivery on both sides of the laptop, that also means the XPS 13 can charge on either side, which can be very handy when moving the laptop from place to place.

Dell’s design ethos with their XPS lineup has converged across the entire range of XPS laptops, and with great success. The CNC milled aluminum bodies, thin bezels, compact designs, and lightweight chassis make for some of the most compelling devices in the industry. Moving to a 16:10 aspect ration on their XPS line has been yet another design win for Dell, and helps provide the excellent 91.5% screen to body ratio found on this XPS 13 notebook by further shrinking the bottom bezel. Dell has sculpted a clean, sleek, and functional device, and while the rest of the industry has also adopted the thin-bezel design, Dell has really mastered it.

Introduction System Performance
Comments Locked


View All Comments

  • grant3 - Friday, July 17, 2020 - link

    There's an excellent reason why ultrabooks might underperform: their cooling capacity is limited by the form factor.

    If CPU performance, or price:CPU Performance, were the only metrics which mattered to people, then ultrabooks & apple would not exist.
  • Spunjji - Monday, July 20, 2020 - link

    @grant3 - the cooling system on that Acer Swift is pretty terrible!

    @Deicidium - the XPS 13 9300 launched in January this year - that's 6 months ago. It's the current competition for AMD's current mobile chips that launched one month ago. A comparison with a product that hasn't released yet isn't "more appropriate". 🤦‍♂️
  • Deicidium369 - Friday, July 17, 2020 - link

    Ice Lake is almost a year old. The more appropriate comparison is the upcoming Tiger Lake, Anandtech has been slow to get a review unit for an almost year old design, while the next gen is being prepped for release.
  • Santoval - Friday, July 17, 2020 - link

    "Valid" in what sense? sorten is giving Intel a competitive benefit (or, alternatively, gives AMD a handicap) by comparing an AMD "craptop" with an Intel ultrabook; it's not the other way around.
  • Spunjji - Friday, July 17, 2020 - link

    Performance: No, not for Ice Lake.
    Power Consumption: Yes, but only for Ice Lake.
    Price: Not even funny.

    When you combine all three AMD currently come out easily on top, and yet...
  • Meteor2 - Thursday, August 20, 2020 - link

    It's incredible how much people can argue about objective numbers.
  • Deicidium369 - Thursday, July 16, 2020 - link

    Tiger Lake is coming in the next month or so - Lenovo and Acer already have their systems working the Tiger Lake Core i7-1165G7 - 4 core + 96EU Xe LP wrecks the most powerful Renoir in iGPU (actually matching or slightly exceeding the MX350) and with double the CPU cores (4 Intel / 8 AMD) the AMD is only 17% ahead. So Yeah, way less performance from the AMD.

    Problem with AMD is they are still trying to get Skylake levels of performance, but Intel has well moved on from that architecture. Intel is solid as they come in ultralights/ultrabooks.
  • sorten - Thursday, July 16, 2020 - link

    Not sure what you mean when you say "Problem with AMD is they are still trying to get Skylake levels of performance." Zen 2 mobile chips easily outperform Ice Lake and Comet Lake.

    Yes, we all expect the Xe iGPU to outperform AMD's iGPU. Intel has been humiliated for so long in this area that they've put all of their efforts into becoming competitive. In some respects, both brands targeted their competitor's strength, and gave up ground in theirs.

    I'd personally prefer the CPU advantage, because if I'm doing anything with graphics that any decent iGPU can handle, I'd just use the Dell's TB3 port to hook up an eGPU. But everyone has their own priorities, I understand.
  • Cliff34 - Thursday, July 16, 2020 - link

    The problem is that AMD doesn't support Tb3. So if you need Tb3 for anything you will end up buying Intel.
  • PixyMisa - Thursday, July 16, 2020 - link

    AMD does support TB3, as evidence by the fact that you can buy AMD devices with TB3.

    There just aren't many of them.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now