Dell U2412M - 16:10 IPS without Breaking the Bank
by Chris Heinonen on February 28, 2012 9:00 AM ESTIntroducing the Dell U2412M
For every monitor review that I’ve done for AnandTech so far, I know that as soon as I check the comments there will be a thread with the same theme: “I don’t care about 1080p monitors, I only want 16:10 aspect ratios!” When widescreen displays first came out for desktop LCD monitors, virtually every model was a 16:10 display. The 20” Dell I have on my own desk is 16:10, and almost every vendor made 16:10 panels.
As the price of flat panels dropped and HDTV adoption took over, more and more desktop panels migrated to the HDTV aspect ratio of 16:9. The reasons behind this were easy to understand, as you could produce more displays, reuse panels across PC and TV lines, and have a lower cost across the board to let you sell them for less. Most people were more than happy to pay less for a display than to pay 2-3 times as much for those extra 120 pixels at the bottom of a display. As this happened, 16:10 panels became relegated to higher end models, almost always as IPS panels and often with high end features like AdobeRGB colorspace support and more.
Dell finally decided to address this with their U2412M display that features a 1920x1200 on its 24” panel. The U2412M is also an eIPS panel that is natively 6-bit but uses A-FRC to display 16.7 million colors. Dell has managed to bring this monitor in at $329 and can often be found on sale for under $300, while most other 16:10 24” panels come in at $500 or more. What did Dell have to do to hit this aggressive price point? Let's find out, starting with the specifications overview.
Dell U2412M Specifications | |
Video Inputs | D-sub, DVI, DisplayPort |
Panel Type | eIPS |
Pixel Pitch | 0.27 mm |
Colors | 16.7 Million (6-bit with A-FRC) |
Brightness | 300 nits |
Contrast Ratio | 1000:1 (Typical) |
Response Time | 8ms GTG |
Viewable Size | 24" |
Resolution | 1920x1200 |
Viewing Angle | 178 H, 178 V |
Backlight | LED |
Power Consumption (operation) | 38W |
Power Consumption (standby) | Not Listed |
Screen Treatment | Anti-Glare with Hard Coat 3H |
Height-Adjustable | Yes, 4.5" of adjustment |
Tilt | Yes |
Pivot | Yes |
Swivel | Yes |
VESA Wall Mounting | Yes, 100mm VESA |
Dimensions w/ Base (WxHxD) | 20.22" x 21.89" x 7.10" |
Weight | 8.73 lbs. without stand |
Additional Features | 4 port USB Hub, Power Management Software |
Limited Warranty | 3 Years |
Accessories | Power Cable, DVI Cable, USB Cable, VGA Cable |
Price | $329 at Dell.com |
The stand with the U2412M is very adjustable, with tilt, swivel, pivot, and height adjustments available to the user. There is a 4-port USB 2.0 hub with two ports on the bottom of the display and two that are more accessible on the side of the display. The one port you might find missing is an HDMI port, but as the HDMI port is trademarked and requires licensing fees, and adds nothing that other ports don’t offer on a display with no speakers, I’m not particularly sad about the loss. Most HDMI transmitter chips are limited to 1920x1080 resolution as well and that would just be another cost that really adds no benefit. DisplayPort is starting to become more and more common now and I’d prefer to see those ports instead.
143 Comments
View All Comments
Finraziel - Friday, March 2, 2012 - link
Perhaps if all you do on that screen is play games, yes... Personally, I'd LOVE 120 hz, I can often still see chopping at 60hz and hate it. But, so far, getting a 120hz monitor means you have to compromise at just about everything else. I also hate the colourshifts in TN screens and I do other stuff on my system as well for which I really don't want to go to a 1080p screen (yes, I'd miss those 120 lines). If anything, if I'm buying a new screen, I want more desktop space, not less.Maybe new display technologies will make it possible to offer 120 hz at higher resolutions and better display quality. Until then I guess I'll stick with my old dell 2405FPW...
T2k - Thursday, March 1, 2012 - link
You must be blind.Sabresiberian - Tuesday, February 28, 2012 - link
This IS a review of a quality monitor. It might not fit your needs, but it is above any TN screen, and priced in the ballpark of the best of those. It isn't intended to be the best out there, but provide a decent 16:10 at a relatively low price point.Anandtech.com reviews a wide variety of monitor qualities, if you think they just do low-quality monitors you must have just started reading here and need to learn how to look up past articles. It's not hard.
;)
toyotabedzrock - Wednesday, February 29, 2012 - link
He/She wasn't attacking anantech.And this screen is not much better than a TN monitor except in viewing angles.
seapeople - Wednesday, February 29, 2012 - link
Wow, you screen snobs are getting overbearing.SlyNine - Thursday, March 8, 2012 - link
Yea, because saying this screen isn't much better then a TN monitor makes him a screen snob...You don't own a Dell U2412M by any chance do you ?
DarkUltra - Tuesday, February 28, 2012 - link
It should have said so in the header. Now it says only IPS which is misleading, aka getting more hopeful visitors.Visual - Wednesday, February 29, 2012 - link
Totally agree, calling eIPS IPS is downright lieing to your readers.Tetracycloide - Wednesday, February 29, 2012 - link
Panel Type eIPSWhat are you on about exactly?
Visual - Thursday, March 1, 2012 - link
Article title.