BAPCo SYSmark 25

The Zotac ZBOX CI662 nano was evaluated using our Fall 2018 test suite for small-form factor PCs. In the first section, we will be looking at SYSmark 25.

BAPCo's SYSmark 25 is an application-based benchmark that uses real-world applications to replay usage patterns of business users in the areas of productivity, creativity, and responsiveness. The 'Productivity Scenario' covers office-centric activities including word processing, spreadsheet usage, financial analysis, software development, application installation, file compression, and e-mail management. The 'Creativity Scenario' represents media-centric activities such as digital photo processing, AI and ML for face recognition in photos and videos for the purpose of content creation, etc. The 'Responsiveness Scenario' evaluates the ability of the system to react in a quick manner to user inputs in areas such as application and file launches, web browsing, and multi-tasking.

Scores are meant to be compared against a reference desktop (the SYSmark 25 calibration system, a Lenovo Thinkcenter M720q with a Core i5-8500T and 8GB of DDR4 memory to go with a 256GB M.2 NVMe SSD). The calibration system scores 1000 in each of the scenarios. A score of, say, 2000, would imply that the system under test is twice as fast as the reference system.

SYSmark 25 - Productivity

SYSmark 25 - Creativity

SYSmark 25 - Responsiveness

SYSmark 25 - Overall

SYSmark 25 also adds energy measurement to the mix. A high score in the SYSmark benchmarks might be nice to have, but, potential customers also need to determine the balance between power consumption and the efficiency of the system. For example, in the average office scenario, it might not be worth purchasing a noisy and power-hungry PC just because it ends up with a 2000 score in the SYSmark 2014 SE benchmarks. In order to provide a balanced perspective, SYSmark 25 also allows vendors and decision makers to track the energy consumption during each workload. In the graphs below, we find the total energy consumed by the PC under test for a single iteration of each SYSmark 25 workload. For reference, the calibration system consumes 8.88 Wh for productivity, 10.81 Wh for creativity, and 19.69 Wh overall.

SYSmark 25 - Productivity Energy Consumption

SYSmark 25 - Creativity Energy Consumption

SYSmark 25 - Overall Energy Consumption

The raw scores are in line with the capabilities of the CPU used in the different systems, with the hexa-core Core i7-10710U in the Frost Canyon NUC outscoring the quad-core Core i7-10510U in the CI662 nano. The ECS LIVA Z3 also sports a 4C/8T processor, but the clock speeds are lower and the cache is also smaller, which makes it drop behind the CI662 nano. The energy numbers, on the other hand, do not look good for the CI 662 nano. This is a problem we observed in the CI 660 nano review also - the idle power consumption numbers being a bit too high. In the SYSmark 25 energy consumption numbers, it is also translating to quite a bit of extra energy being consumed in the process of completing the workloads.

Introduction and Product Impressions UL Benchmarks - PCMark and 3DMark
POST A COMMENT

16 Comments

View All Comments

  • wr3zzz - Tuesday, January 5, 2021 - link

    I am a huge fan of passively cooled PC but at this price point there is not much value proposition. I understand that there are no more Y-series CPU at the moment (love my HP Folio) but most notebook at $700 price point today has a silent fan profile if one were to use it as a HTPC. Also, this thing is not a looker either and for aesthetics I would rather have a notebook with display off as HTPC. For everything else its performance is no better than a notebook of equivalent value and I would trade the fan noise for actual utility of having the display and inputs in one unit.

    NUC has no chance if its value proposition is inferior to notebooks.
    Reply
  • Operandi - Tuesday, January 5, 2021 - link

    Yeah, I have to agree the value of this as a HTPC is absurd which is a shame as lit looks like it works quite well. And from the pics I think it actually looks alright (at least from pics) from ID perspective; much better than the ugly AF Intel NUCs.

    I got a pretty good deal on a older 8000 series NUC and put it in a passive Akasa case. Looks very cool, cools decently but still pretty expensive even if the NUC was way under retail.
    Reply
  • Hulk - Tuesday, January 5, 2021 - link

    My thoughts exactly. You can buy a laptop for less money. The price point is way off.

    Beside that huge miss it also needs a Tiger Lake processor for better performance and thermals/efficiency.
    Reply
  • jeremyshaw - Tuesday, January 5, 2021 - link

    I would even argue as a forward looking HTPC, the lack of Tiger Lake kills it. No hardware AV1 decode on these old Skylake+++ CPUs. Reply
  • Jorgp2 - Tuesday, January 5, 2021 - link

    There's always the Atom based NUCs if you just want an HTPC.

    Hopefully the Tremont based NUCs will have 4K 10bit HDR output this time.
    Reply
  • npz - Tuesday, January 5, 2021 - link

    I have yet to hear a laptop that is actually quiet under load. Who says this mini-PC purpose is for HTPC only? There are much cheaper options for HTPC only PCs.

    You are paying a premium for true silence under total load for actual work e.g. Adobe Creative Suite, etc. that you won't find on any laptop or a fanned NUC/mini-pc. Speaking of which, NUCs are also loud, like all laptops, under load. I personally can't stand my notebook when it's doing encoding or anything video processing related.
    Reply
  • npz - Tuesday, January 5, 2021 - link

    Custom fitted heatsink pieces like this are just not mass produced:
    https://www.zotac.com/download/files/page/Ci660/ci...
    Reply
  • wr3zzz - Tuesday, January 5, 2021 - link

    The Y-series 5W chips are always passively cooled and totally silent but are only for premium products easily over $1000+. Intel just hasn't made one for 10nm yet. The last one was from two years ago.

    Nobody is going to run Adobe Creative Suite or doing any content creation on this machine for that matter. Besides HTPC it's just productivity softwares which you can certainly run silently in no fan mode in recent notebooks if the the design is decent.
    Reply
  • npz - Tuesday, January 5, 2021 - link

    The Y chips are also correspondingly much weaker, and those are used in the lower end Surfaces if I recall. The higher end laptops/tablets don't use Y series chips

    And why not run Adobe software on a machine like this, with laptop class latest gen i7 cpu?! Even Intel advertises their i7 NUCs with explicit Adobe Premiere editing in their marketing.
    This isn't a low end Celeron or Pentium or Bay Trail class cpu that would be HTPC . Even productivity sotware / office suites can put heavy load on the cpu. Try some heavy spreadsheet calculation for example. PDF software like for OCR would also ramp up fans. Even if you're not editing movies, just editing photos can put 100% load on all cores. Or are you saying no one should edit photos on these machines?
    Reply
  • npz - Tuesday, January 5, 2021 - link

    And if I can use Adobe CC suite and Handbrake and others on my old Broadwell laptop, I would certainly do the same on this type of machine. Think about movie editing apps in Google Play that's running on much weaker Android devices Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now