In a surprising twist, AMD has today announced that it intends to enable Ryzen 4000 and Zen 3 support on its older B450 and X470 Motherboards. This is going to be a ‘promise now, figure out the details later’ arrangement, but this should enable most (if not all) users running 400 series AMD motherboards to upgrade to the Zen 3 processors set to be unveiled later this year.


When AMD launched the Ryzen 3 3300X and Ryzen 3 3100 processors, it also gave users details about the upcoming B550 chipset that these processors were targeted for. Part of that announcement included a chart, showing how due to BIOS limitations, certain chipsets would only support certain AM4 processors. X570, for example, would support previous Ryzen 2000, current Ryzen 3000, and future Ryzen 4000 processors – it did not support the original Ryzen 1000 processors.

On that chart, it was noted almost immediately that there was a glaring omission. AMD’s B450 and X470 motherboards were listed as supporting Ryzen 1000/2000/3000, but not the future Zen3-based Ryzen 4000 processors. This made a number of users immediately very concerned, especially if they had purchased a B450 or X470 motherboard with a Ryzen 3000 processor with the hopes to upgrade it in the future.

AMD came under a lot of fire. The company had originally promised that it would support the AM4 platform from 2016 through 2020 (or ‘through to’ 2020). A lot of users had assumed that this meant any AM4 platform based motherboard would be able to accept any processor made from 2016 to 2020, including the new Zen 3 processors set to be unveiled later this year. The fact that there was a discrepancy between what the users expected and what AMD had been saying essentially became a miscommunication or a misunderstanding, but one that had a negative effect on a number of users who were expecting to upgrade the system.

Ultimately the reason for the lockout was down to the BIOS size. Each generation of processors require a portion of the BIOS space for compatibility code – normally if you can support one processor from a generation, then you can support them all. We are also in the era of graphical interface BIOSes, and as a result some of the BIOS code was reserved for fancy menus and the ability to adjust fan curves or update the BIOS in a more intuitive way. All of this takes up space, and some vendors ditched the fancy graphics in order to support more processors.

Most AMD motherboards are outfitted with 128 megabit (16 megabyte) BIOS chips. The reason why this is the case is due to a limitation on some of AMD’s early AM4 processors – due to design, they can only ever address the first 16 megabytes of a BIOS chip. So even if a motherboard vendor had a larger BIOS chip, say MSI had a 32 megabyte chip, then it would actually operate like two partitioned BIOSes and it would get very complicated. There is no easy way to support every AM4 processor with a simple 16 megabyte BIOS.

By our estimate there are 84/86 current processors on the AM4 platform in total, counting Ryzen Pro parts as well. These are set across several families (A-Series, Zen, Zen APU, Zen+, Zen+ APU, Zen2, Zen2 APU, etc), each with their own AGESA platform to deal with, which all has to go into the BIOS. This is what makes it such a tight squeeze.

As a result AMD initially made the decision that the B450/X470 motherboards would support the Ryzen 1000, Ryzen 2000, and Ryzen 3000 processors, but would not be able to support any more due to this limit. AMD ultimately wanted the 500-series chipsets, the B550/X570, to be a launchpad for the future Ryzen processors.

AMD’s Announcement Today

AMD today is reversing its decision to limit the BIOSes on the 400-series chipsets. To cut a long story short, the TL;DR mantra from AMD is:

‘We’ve heard our audience, and we understand the concerns. We are going to work out a way to support Zen 3 on our 400-series chipsets between now and launch – we’re still working out the what and the how, but we will update you closer to Zen 3 launch’.

They are acknowledging that they perhaps misread the situation from its user base. Part of this issue stems from an old CPU line not having the growth room, and the believed that pushing support for Zen 3 to the 500-series wouldn’t be that big of an issue. Now that they see it is, they will try to make it work. They will attempt to address the technical challenges, and even though they do not have all the details at this time, it will be worked on.

There is still 6+ months (?) until we see Zen 3, so they do have a lot of time to try things and to test things.

In conversations with AMD, we also discovered more insight into what this entails.

As most motherboards have 16 MB, and the CPUs can only address the first 16 MB of a BIOS chip, then we might see an issue where 400-series motherboards may end up having two ‘forked’ BIOSes – one for ‘up to Ryzen 3000 inclusive’ and one for ‘Ryzen 3000 and beyond’. The former one will likely be a default BIOS, which will be picked up by auto-update software, however the latter will likely always be a Beta BIOS, and it will require user intervention.

AMD will enable the ODM partners with the feature – partners like ASUS, GIGABYTE, Dell, HP, MSI, Lenovo, etc. However, it will be up to the ODM partner to actually enable it as a feature for their motherboard or pre-built system. If they’re not willing to complicate matters with this BIOS fork, then unfortunately you are out of luck. It is believed however that if most of the vendors are onboard straightaway, then the rest will follow. AMD will be offering continual support to its ODM partners on this, especially those with auto-update software.

There might be a situation where moving up to the beta BIOS fork will make the system unable to downgrade. It might end up being a one-way solution. It might even be a hard changeover – with the mainline supporting 3000 and below, and the fork 4000 and up. In this event, I asked AMD if they would be expanding the Boot Kit program as they did with Ryzen 2000, and lending CPUs to users that needed them to update. AMD stated that this might be a possibility, but they haven’t worked on those details at this time.

AMD reiterated to AnandTech that after the launch of B550 into the market, they do recommend the B550 motherboards as the best option for Ryzen 4000 support in upgrades. However they will be working towards supporting Ryzen 4000 on 400-series chipsets for current users in that market, and to enable customers who want to go along that upgrade path. It is worth reiterating that even with Zen 3 CPU support, B450/X470 boards will likely be limited to PCIe 3.0 due to the design.

AMD also re-confirmed that we are set to see Zen 3 processors in 2020.

AMD AM4 Motherboard Support
AnandTech uArch A320 B350
X570 B550
Ryzen 4000 CPU Zen 3 X X Beta
Ryzen 4000 APU** Zen 2 X ? ? ? ?
Ryzen 3000 CPU Zen 2 X Beta
Ryzen 3000 APU Zen+ X
Ryzen 2000 CPU Zen+ X
Ryzen 2000 APU Zen X X
Ryzen 1000 CPU Zen X X
Athlon A-Series * X X X
Ryzen Pro CPUs follow their non-Pro equivalents
* Excavator or Carrizo
** Unknown - product not announced yet

AMD's full press release is given below.

As we head into our upcoming “Zen 3” architecture, there are considerable technical challenges that face a CPU socket as long-lived as AMD Socket AM4. For example, we recently announced that we would not support “Zen 3” on AMD 400 Series motherboards due to serious constraints in SPI ROM capacities in most of the AMD 400 Series motherboards. This is not the first time a technical hurdle has come up with Socket AM4 given the longevity of this socket, but it is the first time our enthusiasts have faced such a hurdle.

Over the past week, we closely reviewed your feedback on that news: we watched every video, read every comment and saw every Tweet. We hear that many of you hoped a longer upgrade path. We hear your hope that AMD B450 and X470 chipsets would carry you into the “Zen 3” era.

Our experience has been that large-scale BIOS upgrades can be difficult and confusing especially as processors come on and off the support lists. As the community of Socket AM4 customers has grown over the past three years, our intention was to take a path forward that provides the safest upgrade experience for the largest number of users. However, we hear you loud and clear when you tell us you would like to see B450 or X470 boards extended to the next generation “Zen 3” products.

As the team weighed your feedback against the technical challenges we face, we decided to change course. As a result, we will enable an upgrade path for B450 and X470 customers that adds support for next-gen AMD Ryzen™ Processors with the “Zen 3” architecture. This decision is very fresh, but here is a first look at how the upgrade path is expected to work for customers of these motherboards.

  1. We will develop and enable our motherboard partners with the code to support “Zen 3”-based processors in select beta BIOSes for AMD B450 and X470 motherboards.
  2. These optional BIOS updates will disable support for many existing AMD Ryzen™ Desktop Processor models to make the necessary ROM space available.
  3. The select beta BIOSes will enable a one-way upgrade path for AMD Ryzen Processors with “Zen 3,” coming later this year. Flashing back to an older BIOS version will not be supported.
  4. To reduce the potential for confusion, our intent is to offer BIOS download only to verified customers of 400 Series motherboards who have purchased a new desktop processor with “Zen 3” inside. This will help us ensure that customers have a bootable processor on-hand after the BIOS flash, minimizing the risk a user could get caught in a no-boot situation.
  5. Timing and availability of the BIOS updates will vary and may not immediately coincide with the availability of the first “Zen 3”-based processors.
  6. This is the final pathway AMD can enable for 400 Series motherboards to add new CPU support. CPU releases beyond “Zen 3” will require a newer motherboard.
  7. AMD continues to recommend that customers choose an AMD 500 Series motherboard for the best performance and features with our new CPUs.

There are still many details to iron out, but we’ve already started the necessary planning. As we get closer to the launch of this upgrade path, you should expect another blog just like this to provide the remaining details and a walkthrough of the specific process.

At CES 2017, AMD made a commitment: we would support AMD Socket AM4 until 2020. We’ve spent the next three years working very hard to fulfill that promise across four architectures, plus pioneering use of new technologies like chiplets and PCIe® Gen 4. Thanks to your feedback, we are now set to bring “Zen 3” to the AMD 400 Series chipsets. We’re grateful for your passion and support of AMD’s products and technologies.

Comments Locked


View All Comments

  • rarson - Wednesday, May 20, 2020 - link

    Zen 3 was on slides before Zen even launched.

    It's really annoying to keep hearing the Intel argument. Yes, we know that Intel doesn't often carry over CPU support, that's one of the reasons why we buy AMD. Lots of people buy AMD because their CPU support was based around the socket, and you didn't have to worry about new CPUs dropping support for different chipsets. The fact that they did this right out of the gate, by releasing X470 only a year later and not officially supporting Zen+ on X370 was infuriating even if motherboard manufacturers did add support. If AMD wants to shift CPU support to the chipset, then fine, but they should have told their customers first. I wouldn't have bought an X370 board at launch if I had known AMD was going to pull this stuff.

    There's no technical reason why X370 can't support Zen 4, and a large reason why this problem even exists is because AMD decided to put all of their APUs on the same socket as the CPUs for some reason. Had they just kept them on different sockets, this probably never would have been an issue.
  • Spunjji - Friday, May 22, 2020 - link

    Not to keep this going indefinitely, @rarson, but those slides are from 2 months after Ryzen launched.

    The "Intel argument" keeps being made because it's relevant. None of this tech exists in a vacuum. I think they're doing a decent job all things considered. Could the situation be better? Yes. Could it be a lot worse? Oh my, yes.

    Pointing to older architectures and the decisions made then as a reason to expect them to stay the same isn't entirely helpful, either - AMD were in a woeful competitive position from AM2 onwards.
  • rarson - Sunday, May 24, 2020 - link

    My mistake, I was thinking Ryzen launched in May, not March.

    That being said I'm fairly sure that I saw that slide before May, and before Ryzen launch. I could be mistaken, but the existence of Zen 3 and its use of AM4 was at least rumored before Zen launched and AMD would have been planning all of this well before they released the slide anyway.

    The "Intel argument" is not relevant here. Not for AMD customers. I've already explained ad nauseum why this is the case. After decades of chips being tied to sockets, the least AMD could have done was to let people know they were changing the rules. One of the reasons why I've built so many AMD systems in the past and so few Intel builds is because of the fact that upgrade paths were much clearer.

    In this case, pointing to older architectures is the entire point: decades of setting customer expectations led to people assuming nothing had changed.
  • headloser - Wednesday, May 20, 2020 - link

    It not your fault. You couldn't predict how the 4000 series are going to affect the BIOS. I think AMD need to upgrade the BIOS 16mb to maybe 32mb. Since the CPU are becoming more powerful and has the ability to do more, they need to build BIOS adaptability for future upgrade.
  • Arnulf - Wednesday, May 20, 2020 - link

    Perhaps they should have gone with Intel which was selling 1xx/2xx series chipsets for Skylake/Kaby lake in 2016 ...
  • Samus - Wednesday, May 20, 2020 - link

    While I agree a GUI BIOS is a waste of space (personally I hate them, they are slow to navigate and less intuitive) it will still be a huge challenge to fit microcode for 100 individual CPU’s (taking into account individual designs, stepping, generation, etc) into 16MB. Most microcode files are around 200kb give or take. You still need UEFI drivers, USB legacy initialization for HID devices, a network stack for live BIOS updating, and so on.

    I think AMD is in a tough spot here, and the consensus is they should just drop 1000 series support since they have the most errata (and hence the largest microcode updates, though they don’t “have” to use the latest microcode I guess...) and I can’t imagine people running first gen parts anymore on brand new boards unless their old board failed.

    It’s really interesting to see AMD commit to supporting a socket interface this long.
  • rarson - Wednesday, May 20, 2020 - link

    They should have just left the APUs on their own socket.
  • rarson - Tuesday, May 19, 2020 - link

    AMD can't eliminate support for the older CPUs as these are popular options in foreign markets.

    I'm all for getting rid of the stupid graphics in BIOS. I've always hated fancy interfaces that make it more difficult to find and change the settings that you need, especially since once I get the BIOS set up as I want, I don't intend to continue going back into it anyway. I prefer the old school low-res, text-based, keyboard only BIOSes. I don't need a freaking "EZ mode" or any of that nonsense, I just need a clean, simple menu that I can easily navigate through.
  • zmatt - Tuesday, May 19, 2020 - link

    I think it was GN who said that if they went back to old school tabulated interfaces in the BIOS then reviewers would complain and make them look bad. I say fine. It lets me know who to take seriously. The A E S T H E T I C S of the BIOS shouldn't matter. Its there for setting system configuration and maybe overclocking. Not to look cool. Most people will only ever be there once or twice.

    Any reviewer who values how a flashy interface over practical support and features isn't credible in the enthusiast space. They can go review Apple products for all I care.
  • rarson - Tuesday, May 19, 2020 - link

    Yeah, I generally agree with Steve and I understand his sentiment, but I don't think the issue would be as big a deal as he thinks if it means Zen 3 support is added to existing products. Surely the people who are buying and using them wouldn't mind the trade-off.

    I WANT a BIOS that looks old, because those old BIOSes were stupidly simple to navigate and change settings. I don't want to have to use a mouse to change settings. These stupid graphical UEFI environments often leave me wondering where exactly I need to click on something or what is a dropdown/toggle, etc. A simple text interface is infinitely cleaner and easier to use. A graphics-less BIOS is a feature that I actually want, not a detriment.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now